Ornette Colemen
Science Fiction - Part II
1971
Why am I writing about this record? [LINK]
OK. My mind is ready. Pushing 'Play' on 'Happy House';
An element of that template discussed in part 1. all instruments playing in unison while drums and bass roll around in the background. Short bursts of ideas punctuated with long rests. Setting up a free-for-all of chattering in the pre-solo section.
Is it unfair that saxophone always makes me think of ducks? There is a temptation to associate this kind of feeling with a frantic panic or manic psychosis. David Lynch loves this kind of shit. But there is an underlying current of calm, serene focus. For anyone that's ever played an instrument and tried/accomplished playing lines like this, you know there is an amount of total focus and control that is needed to give the impression of no focus or control.
If Jazz is a koan, this is the answer to the koan. In the interim between this and the first part, I did look up who played trumpet on this record. A lot of different people. But yes, many times it does appear that Ornette Coleman himself is playing the trumpet. I suppose I should have known this, but I didn't. That's a pretty cool thing to learn! I Don't think it is him on this track though.
I really find myself trying to look through the mix to find the bass. That guy is just doing some incredible work here. I don't understand drums enough to pick out the subtleties of the percussion, but the bass work is clear as day to me. As I said before, it is clearly revolutionary. There are a few really nice textures he helps build. Dropping out for 4-8 bars at a time when everyone starts chattering. Edging in and out with rising or descending half-steps or modal tones. These are things I want to process and begin including in my own compositional/arrangement theories.
Another seminal sounding drum solo. These tracks are like water flowing down a creek, turning into a river, finding small eddies inside stony nooks. 'Elizabeth' - swirling, methodical. The Bass is being bowed and finding all manner of effects not truly appreciated in the mainstream until the advent of ubiquitous electronic production.
I find myself again searching for the 'glue'. This sound clearly holds together, but how? It's as if an invisible force fills in the gaps, making it coherent. Again with the Star Wars references. I wasn't purposefully doing that because of the title of the record. Interesting how the subconscious works.
There is a lot to be learned here for musicians of every genre. The concepts and consensuses that hold these sounds together, willing them into coherency are the principals of arrangement. Ethereal concepts, cousins to Platonic solids.
Foundational elements. I just described this track as 'swirling'. And now five minutes in, it has started to develop into shapes and figures. A microcosmic, musical analogy for the formation of the universe. The Bass droning and dropping half steps slowly. Slipping in and out of poly-meter. Resting briefly on a small patch of ii-V-I, then off to play again. Those effects! The bass makes up a large part of the otherwise unobservable glue here (and possibly most of the tracks). When all else (including the drums) carry a connotation of aimless wandering, the bass provides a solid contrast of intent.
Absolutely not to say that the other parts are not intentional. They surely have to be. But they do not carry that immediate ethos of intent. The bass is going somewhere. Always either going somewhere or holding down the tarpaulins from flying away.
When the other instruments are playing the melody line, it sounds almost as if the bass is playing the same notes as in the melody but just a little faster. It gives these parts a 'slippery' feel. The track ends with those gorgeous bass effects! wow!
If you only listen to one track on this record, make it 'Elizabeth'. Stunning!
'Written Word' - These tracks with only trumpet, drums and bass are likely Coleman. deduced by language and context. It's his record, so if there's only one lead instrument. probably him yeah? Nope.. there's the sax. Damn. That guy was blowing hard af. I forgot to look up whether Coltrane came before or after. I'm thinking before now. I don't know.. Was Coltrane in the 50's?
"Miles is not pleased with you!" :(
There is a modern Indian Saxophonist who I can not remember the name of, but he plays a lot of licks like this. It sounds just like language, which obviously music is. But it really SOUNDS like TALKING when played like this! I love these moments when the musicians are just dressing out the skeleton of the chart. Again, like the cover of the record so perfectly captures, this pastel blending quality of the notes being played to the harmonic context they appear in.
It's also interesting to note that there is no 'chordal' context in a lot of these tracks. With only the base to hold down the figure, almost all harmony becomes completely fluid and subjective. This becomes a powerful weapon in the hands of a true Jedi. Whereas some tracks feel like Finn speeding down the mouth of a miniaturized death star, this track feels more like Luke projecting himself from the top of Mt. Whateverthefuck into the battle zone. A calm, yet all-encompassing energy. An Energy that would not be capable of being so powerful if it was anything but absolute calm. As the track unwinds we get a glimpse of Kylo Ren realizing that none of it was real. A small smattering of thoughts and a decaying cymbal crash show us Luke, dissolving into the everlasting force as he also realizes that none of it is real.
Is it unfair that saxophone always makes me think of ducks? There is a temptation to associate this kind of feeling with a frantic panic or manic psychosis. David Lynch loves this kind of shit. But there is an underlying current of calm, serene focus. For anyone that's ever played an instrument and tried/accomplished playing lines like this, you know there is an amount of total focus and control that is needed to give the impression of no focus or control.
If Jazz is a koan, this is the answer to the koan. In the interim between this and the first part, I did look up who played trumpet on this record. A lot of different people. But yes, many times it does appear that Ornette Coleman himself is playing the trumpet. I suppose I should have known this, but I didn't. That's a pretty cool thing to learn! I Don't think it is him on this track though.
I really find myself trying to look through the mix to find the bass. That guy is just doing some incredible work here. I don't understand drums enough to pick out the subtleties of the percussion, but the bass work is clear as day to me. As I said before, it is clearly revolutionary. There are a few really nice textures he helps build. Dropping out for 4-8 bars at a time when everyone starts chattering. Edging in and out with rising or descending half-steps or modal tones. These are things I want to process and begin including in my own compositional/arrangement theories.
Another seminal sounding drum solo. These tracks are like water flowing down a creek, turning into a river, finding small eddies inside stony nooks. 'Elizabeth' - swirling, methodical. The Bass is being bowed and finding all manner of effects not truly appreciated in the mainstream until the advent of ubiquitous electronic production.
I find myself again searching for the 'glue'. This sound clearly holds together, but how? It's as if an invisible force fills in the gaps, making it coherent. Again with the Star Wars references. I wasn't purposefully doing that because of the title of the record. Interesting how the subconscious works.
There is a lot to be learned here for musicians of every genre. The concepts and consensuses that hold these sounds together, willing them into coherency are the principals of arrangement. Ethereal concepts, cousins to Platonic solids.
Foundational elements. I just described this track as 'swirling'. And now five minutes in, it has started to develop into shapes and figures. A microcosmic, musical analogy for the formation of the universe. The Bass droning and dropping half steps slowly. Slipping in and out of poly-meter. Resting briefly on a small patch of ii-V-I, then off to play again. Those effects! The bass makes up a large part of the otherwise unobservable glue here (and possibly most of the tracks). When all else (including the drums) carry a connotation of aimless wandering, the bass provides a solid contrast of intent.
Absolutely not to say that the other parts are not intentional. They surely have to be. But they do not carry that immediate ethos of intent. The bass is going somewhere. Always either going somewhere or holding down the tarpaulins from flying away.
When the other instruments are playing the melody line, it sounds almost as if the bass is playing the same notes as in the melody but just a little faster. It gives these parts a 'slippery' feel. The track ends with those gorgeous bass effects! wow!
If you only listen to one track on this record, make it 'Elizabeth'. Stunning!
'Written Word' - These tracks with only trumpet, drums and bass are likely Coleman. deduced by language and context. It's his record, so if there's only one lead instrument. probably him yeah? Nope.. there's the sax. Damn. That guy was blowing hard af. I forgot to look up whether Coltrane came before or after. I'm thinking before now. I don't know.. Was Coltrane in the 50's?
"Miles is not pleased with you!" :(
There is a modern Indian Saxophonist who I can not remember the name of, but he plays a lot of licks like this. It sounds just like language, which obviously music is. But it really SOUNDS like TALKING when played like this! I love these moments when the musicians are just dressing out the skeleton of the chart. Again, like the cover of the record so perfectly captures, this pastel blending quality of the notes being played to the harmonic context they appear in.
It's also interesting to note that there is no 'chordal' context in a lot of these tracks. With only the base to hold down the figure, almost all harmony becomes completely fluid and subjective. This becomes a powerful weapon in the hands of a true Jedi. Whereas some tracks feel like Finn speeding down the mouth of a miniaturized death star, this track feels more like Luke projecting himself from the top of Mt. Whateverthefuck into the battle zone. A calm, yet all-encompassing energy. An Energy that would not be capable of being so powerful if it was anything but absolute calm. As the track unwinds we get a glimpse of Kylo Ren realizing that none of it was real. A small smattering of thoughts and a decaying cymbal crash show us Luke, dissolving into the everlasting force as he also realizes that none of it is real.
I wonder, why did they call this 'Science Fiction'? 'Broken Shadows'; Two saxophones. Three Saxophones? 2 in the back, 1 solo. A distinctly different texture than the other 'slow, slippery' tracks on the record. The drums are very restrained, insisting on a groove instead of swerving around it. The addition of a solo instrument 'talking' over the background texture is the main new element here that gives this a three-dimensional aspect compared to the vocal tracks of the same style earlier.
It's as if all the previous tracks have worked to teach you the basic building blocks and now they are putting them together in some novel ways. The way a foreign language course builds in complexity, each unit dependent on and assuming you comprehended the previous.
'Rubber Gloves' - perfect track for being quarantined. This is how I feel most days now. a little stir crazy and a bit too slap happy. Stuck inside. Learning how to live with people that you live with. When you are stuck together with people for a long time like almost none of us have ever been. You find out that conversations are tricky without the naturally occurring intervals during the day and week where one can find space to process or gain perspective. There is a Call/Response format through the beginning of this track, which gradually becomes longer solo sections which are in and of themselves just longer calls and longer responses. But this is not a break dancing battle where opponents square off on a cardboard mat to challenge each other or try to be better or more creative. It's not a competition, it's a conversation. The difference is essential to understanding why this music sounds like it does.
'Good Girl Blues' I had to restart this track several times. What an INCREDIBLE SOUND! That has to be one of the reasons this album was called science fiction. in 1971 there were definitely bands experimenting with synthesizers and learning to painstakingly craft new sounds that we take for granted today. But no electronics are in use here, but the intro to this tune could have been one of those WHO songs like 'Baba' where Pete was experimenting with loops and synths!
I am not a huge fan of this swinging zoot suit kind of sound. The whole Brian Setzer vibe seems out of place for the context of this album. I would have skipped this track if it was much longer. It kind of just took me out of it. But all those crazy sounds were worth it! If Jody reads this, I know he'll accuse me of blasphemy on several levels. But I'm counting on his (and Miles') disappointment over my pathetic knowledge of jazz/music history for him to notice too much.
'Is it Forever'; Another one with this guy. He's probably a famous singer and a legend. This one is better than the last by miles (pun intended). It doesn't seem so presumptuous. But still, it sounds too affected. Did he know he was on the same record with whoever the female singer was on the first part? He is not hanging with her in the least. I know some of it was the style at the time. His voice is good, but it smacks to me like a movie-star looking dude that just. can't. act. His voice is killer, but the style is much too kitsch for me.
Before I can get too tired of it, the instruments come back in with a very modern sounding orchestral arrangement. If you took out the glissandos, this could be a 1980's string quartet or something of that vintage.
I hate to have even one criticism of this record. But I have two. Both tracks with this guy on it. I would have much preferred to hear just instrumentals or bring back the woman singer from the beginning. I'm going to feel so dumb when I find out who it is, right? I have to know. The record is over. I'll look it up. Webster Armstrong. Hmm. I don't know, I guess I don't feel so bad about ragging him now. Killer voice. Let me make that clear.
While I'm researching things;
Charlie Haden on bass. Yeah, I know that name for sure. Can't say exactly from where. Probably as the bassist for Ornette Coleman. Ha!
And I don't feel so bad about the timeline thing. Looks like Coletrane and Coleman were contemporaries and I was right about the '50s'.
Perhaps Miles is only 'mildly annoyed' at me then. And I'm definitely going to get shit about that Brian Setzer comment.
It's as if all the previous tracks have worked to teach you the basic building blocks and now they are putting them together in some novel ways. The way a foreign language course builds in complexity, each unit dependent on and assuming you comprehended the previous.
'Rubber Gloves' - perfect track for being quarantined. This is how I feel most days now. a little stir crazy and a bit too slap happy. Stuck inside. Learning how to live with people that you live with. When you are stuck together with people for a long time like almost none of us have ever been. You find out that conversations are tricky without the naturally occurring intervals during the day and week where one can find space to process or gain perspective. There is a Call/Response format through the beginning of this track, which gradually becomes longer solo sections which are in and of themselves just longer calls and longer responses. But this is not a break dancing battle where opponents square off on a cardboard mat to challenge each other or try to be better or more creative. It's not a competition, it's a conversation. The difference is essential to understanding why this music sounds like it does.
'Good Girl Blues' I had to restart this track several times. What an INCREDIBLE SOUND! That has to be one of the reasons this album was called science fiction. in 1971 there were definitely bands experimenting with synthesizers and learning to painstakingly craft new sounds that we take for granted today. But no electronics are in use here, but the intro to this tune could have been one of those WHO songs like 'Baba' where Pete was experimenting with loops and synths!
I am not a huge fan of this swinging zoot suit kind of sound. The whole Brian Setzer vibe seems out of place for the context of this album. I would have skipped this track if it was much longer. It kind of just took me out of it. But all those crazy sounds were worth it! If Jody reads this, I know he'll accuse me of blasphemy on several levels. But I'm counting on his (and Miles') disappointment over my pathetic knowledge of jazz/music history for him to notice too much.
'Is it Forever'; Another one with this guy. He's probably a famous singer and a legend. This one is better than the last by miles (pun intended). It doesn't seem so presumptuous. But still, it sounds too affected. Did he know he was on the same record with whoever the female singer was on the first part? He is not hanging with her in the least. I know some of it was the style at the time. His voice is good, but it smacks to me like a movie-star looking dude that just. can't. act. His voice is killer, but the style is much too kitsch for me.
Before I can get too tired of it, the instruments come back in with a very modern sounding orchestral arrangement. If you took out the glissandos, this could be a 1980's string quartet or something of that vintage.
I hate to have even one criticism of this record. But I have two. Both tracks with this guy on it. I would have much preferred to hear just instrumentals or bring back the woman singer from the beginning. I'm going to feel so dumb when I find out who it is, right? I have to know. The record is over. I'll look it up. Webster Armstrong. Hmm. I don't know, I guess I don't feel so bad about ragging him now. Killer voice. Let me make that clear.
While I'm researching things;
Charlie Haden on bass. Yeah, I know that name for sure. Can't say exactly from where. Probably as the bassist for Ornette Coleman. Ha!
And I don't feel so bad about the timeline thing. Looks like Coletrane and Coleman were contemporaries and I was right about the '50s'.
Perhaps Miles is only 'mildly annoyed' at me then. And I'm definitely going to get shit about that Brian Setzer comment.